Skip to main content
Start Your Project
Service

Accessibility Design

Accessibility design builds the ability to use a product into its structure before any code exists: contrast, focus order, target size, readable content, motion and error handling. Renvric designs interfaces for people using screen readers, keyboards, magnification and voice control, with decisions documented so developers can build them correctly.

Start your project

01

What accessibility design covers

Accessibility design is the part of design work that makes sure people with different abilities and devices can complete tasks. It spans visual choices such as colour contrast and type size, interaction choices such as focus order and touch target size, and content choices such as plain wording and meaningful link text. Standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines provide the checkable baseline.

02

When it is the right investment

It is not a substitute for testing. Design reduces risk, but only testing with assistive technology confirms the result, so the two services are best planned together.

  • You are creating a new product or redesigning one and want inclusive behaviour from the first wireframe, where fixes are cheapest.
  • Your design system is being created or consolidated and each component needs defined states, keyboard behaviour and labels.
  • You serve public sector, education, finance or retail customers where accessibility expectations or legal duties are high.
  • An audit has found failures that trace back to design decisions, not isolated code defects.

What you receive

01

Accessible component specifications

For each component, the roles, names, states, keyboard interactions and focus behaviour a developer must implement.

02

Colour and type system

Palettes tested for contrast in every state, with rules for text size, spacing and use of colour alone.

03

Annotated designs

Flows marked with reading order, landmarks, headings, alternative text intent and error messaging.

04

Content guidance

Patterns for form labels, instructions, error text and link wording that read well to everyone.

05

Acceptance criteria

Checks that testers and developers can use to confirm each component works as specified.

Have a requirement in mind?

Share the outcome you need and Renvric will recommend the smallest useful next step.

How Renvric approaches inclusive design

Understand users and context

Identify the tasks that matter most and the assistive technologies and devices your audience is likely to use.

Review the existing design

Assess current screens or systems against the chosen standard and rank issues by user impact.

Design the foundations

Define colour, typography, spacing, focus styling and motion rules, including reduced-motion behaviour.

Specify interaction

Document keyboard paths, labels and states for complex components such as menus, dialogs, tables and date pickers.

Validate early

Test prototypes with automated checks and manual review, and with disabled users where recruitment is arranged.

Hand over

Walk developers through the specification and remain available as questions arise during build.

05

Design decisions that matter most

Custom components are where accessibility most often fails. A bespoke dropdown that looks distinctive but cannot be operated by keyboard or announced by a screen reader costs more to repair than a native element would have cost to use. Renvric will often recommend native elements where they do the job, and reserves custom behaviour for places where it earns its complexity.

Consider a bank redesigning its transfer form. Placing error messages beside the field, tying them to it programmatically and moving focus to a summary after failed submission helps screen reader users, keyboard users and everyone in a hurry.

06

Risks and how they are managed

  • Brand colours that fail contrast are handled by proposing adjusted tints and showing the visual effect before agreement.
  • Marketing pressure for animated or auto-playing content is met with controls and reduced-motion alternatives.
  • Late design changes can break specifications, so changes go through the same review as the original.
  • Third-party widgets may be inaccessible, which is why they are assessed before being adopted.

Common questions

Typically a review of existing designs, inclusive colour and type rules, component specifications with keyboard and screen reader behaviour, annotated flows, content guidance and acceptance criteria. The exact mix depends on whether you are designing a new product, repairing an existing one or building a design system.

Product teams starting or redesigning a digital product, organisations building design systems, and any business whose audience or regulatory setting makes accessibility important. It also suits teams with audit findings that trace back to design choices.

It depends on the number of journeys and components, and on how much of the design already exists. A focused review of a few key flows is much shorter than designing an entire component library. Timing is estimated after a short scoping conversation.

Mainly the number of screens and components, the complexity of interactions such as data tables and custom widgets, whether user testing with disabled participants is included, and how much existing design must be reworked rather than created fresh.

Designs are checked against the chosen standard using automated tools and manual review, specifications are written so developers can verify them, and prototypes are tested with assistive technology where feasible. Findings and decisions are recorded so that they can be audited later.

Next step

Starting an engagement

01

A short review of your current screens or a design system workshop is a practical first step. Bring examples of your key journeys, brand guidelines and any audit results you already hold.

Start Your Project

Start your project

Fields marked * are required. An incomplete brief is fine: say what is still uncertain.

Preferred contact method *
Include the currency if you know it.
The outcome you need, the current situation, known constraints and timing.
NDA requirement
RFP or brief: PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint or text, up to 5 MB.