Accessibility Testing
Accessibility testing establishes whether people who use screen readers, keyboards, voice control or magnification can actually complete your key journeys. Renvric combines automated scanning, expert manual review and assistive-technology testing, then reports defects by user impact with reproduction steps and fixes developers can act on.
Start your project
What accessibility testing establishes
Testing answers a practical question: can a person who is blind, has low vision, uses only a keyboard, has a motor impairment or finds complex language difficult complete the tasks your product exists for? Standards such as WCAG supply the measurable criteria, and testing shows where a real product falls short of them.
Automated tools detect only a portion of issues. Missing labels and some contrast failures are easy to catch, whereas a confusing focus order or a meaningless link name needs a human.
When it fits, and when it does not
- Before launch of a product, as part of release readiness.
- After a redesign or major feature, when regressions are likely.
- When a customer, regulator or tender requires evidence of conformance.
- As part of regular regression testing, so progress is not lost.
- It fits less well as a one-off exercise on a product that changes weekly with no process for acting on the findings.
Test methods and what each finds
Automated scanning
Quickly finds common code-level failures across many screens, and can run in the build pipeline to prevent regressions.
Manual expert review
Checks headings, landmarks, focus order, labels, error handling, zoom and reflow against the criteria one by one.
Assistive technology testing
Walks key journeys using screen readers, keyboard only, speech control and magnification on the browsers and devices your audience uses.
Usability testing with disabled users
Reveals problems that conformance checks cannot, such as a technically valid flow that is exhausting to complete.
Share the outcome you need and Renvric will recommend the smallest useful next step.
How Renvric approaches an accessibility audit
Agree scope and standard
Decide which journeys, platforms and target conformance level are in scope, and which assistive technologies matter.
Scan and sample
Run automated checks across the product and select representative screens and components for manual depth.
Test with assistive technology
Complete each journey as real users do, recording the behaviour, not only the code.
Report by impact
Rank issues by severity and user effect, with reproduction steps, the criterion affected and a recommended fix.
Support remediation
Answer developer questions, review fixes and retest to confirm closure.
Prevent regression
Add automated checks and a short manual checklist to the release process.
A scenario from retail
Consider an online shop whose checkout passes an automated scan. A screen reader user still cannot complete payment because the postcode error appears visually but is never announced, and focus jumps to the top of the form. Manual and assistive-technology testing finds this; the scan did not. The fix is small once the issue is understood.
What you receive
Related areas to explore: Accessibility design, Business Intelligence Platforms and AI Integration Services.
Accessibility is one strand of Renvric’s quality engineering services; manual testing covers the checks automation cannot.
- A prioritised defect list with reproduction steps, affected criteria and screenshots or recordings.
- A summary for non-technical stakeholders explaining conformance status in plain language.
- Guidance for developers on fixing the root cause, not just the instance.
- A retest report after fixes.
- A regression checklist suited to your release process.
Common questions
What is included in accessibility testing?
Usually automated scans, manual expert review against a stated standard, testing with assistive technologies on agreed browsers and devices, a prioritised defect report with reproduction steps, and a retest after fixes. Testing with disabled users can be added where it suits your goals.
Who is it suitable for?
Product and engineering teams preparing a release, organisations responding to a customer or regulator request, and companies that want accessibility checked continuously as part of delivery. It suits both web and mobile products.
How long does delivery take?
It depends on the number of journeys, templates and platforms in scope, and on the target standard. A single journey can be assessed much more quickly than a full product. Timing is estimated once the scope is agreed.
What affects cost?
Principally the number of screens and component types, the platforms and assistive technologies covered, whether user testing is included, and whether retesting and regression support are in scope. Dynamic or highly custom interfaces generally take longer to examine.
How does Renvric control quality and risk?
Methods and scope are written down before testing starts, findings are reproducible, a second tester reviews severity ratings and limitations are stated in the report. Retesting confirms fixes instead of assuming them.
More services to explore
No test can certify that a product is fully accessible. Findings reflect what was tested, on which devices, at a point in time. Renvric reports scope and limitations openly, and will not describe a result as a conformance certificate unless an appropriate independent process supports it.