Skip to main content
Start Your Project
Service

Cloud Application Development

Renvric builds applications designed for the cloud from the first commit: stateless services, managed data stores, infrastructure defined as code and cost visibility, so the system can grow with demand without being rewritten for every new load. Costs are monitored from the first deployment.

Start your project

01

What cloud-native means in practice

An application hosted in the cloud is not automatically built for it. A cloud application treats servers as replaceable, keeps state in managed stores, scales parts of the system independently and recovers from failure by design. These qualities should be chosen deliberately, because each has a cost.

Renvric will often recommend a well-structured single deployable first, and split services later only where load or team boundaries justify it.

Architecture decisions and trade-offs

01

Modular monolith versus services

A monolith is quicker to build and debug; services help when teams or scaling needs diverge.

02

Containers versus serverless

Containers give control and portability; functions reduce operations for spiky or event-driven work but add cold starts and limits.

03

Managed versus self-run data

Managed databases cut operational effort and lock you into provider features to some degree.

04

Single versus multi-region

Multi-region improves resilience and residency options but multiplies cost and complexity.

03

Deliverables

  • An architecture decision record for each major choice, with alternatives considered.
  • Infrastructure defined as code, so environments can be rebuilt and reviewed.
  • Build and release pipelines with automated tests and staged deployment.
  • Identity, secrets and network design including least-privilege roles.
  • Logging, metrics, tracing and alerts tied to user-facing behaviour.
  • A cost model with tagging and budgets so spend is attributable.
Have a requirement in mind?

Share the outcome you need and Renvric will recommend the smallest useful next step.

04

How the work runs

A thin end-to-end slice is deployed in the first weeks: one user journey running through the pipeline, infrastructure and monitoring. This exposes permission, networking and cost surprises early, while they are cheap to fix. Features are then added in increments that always leave the system releasable.

05

Common risks

  • Unbounded cost from chatty services, verbose logs or idle environments.
  • Provider-specific features adopted without noting the switching cost.
  • Over-engineered orchestration for an application a small team must run.
  • Missing limits on retries and queues, which turn a minor fault into an outage.
06

Peak-traffic example

Consider a ticketing business that sees traffic spike when sales open. Queueing purchase requests, caching read-heavy event listings, and scaling only the checkout service can cost less than running the whole stack at peak capacity all day. A load test before the first major sale would check that assumption.

Related areas to explore: Google Cloud, Cloud transformation and Cloud Consulting.

Common questions

Design, build and release of the application, plus the infrastructure code, pipelines, security configuration, monitoring and documentation needed to operate it. Support after launch and ongoing optimisation can be added as a separate agreement. Environment setup and handover notes are part of that scope.

Teams launching a new product, replacing a hosted legacy system, or needing elastic capacity. It is less suited to a small internal tool with steady, low traffic, where simple hosting may be adequate and cheaper. Examples include a new product, a replatformed system or a service facing uneven demand.

It depends on scope, integrations and compliance needs. A first working slice in a deployed environment is usually produced early, which helps to give a more reliable estimate. A full timeline is agreed after discovery rather than promised in advance.

Build cost depends on features, integrations and quality targets. Running cost depends on compute, storage, data transfer, observability and support model. Renvric estimates both and shows which design choices move them most. Reserved capacity can lower running cost once demand is predictable.

Automated testing and review on every change, staged releases, infrastructure reviewed as code, load testing for expected peaks, and recorded architecture decisions. Security configuration is checked against least-privilege principles before launch. Cost alerts are configured before launch.

01

Bring the expected user numbers and peak patterns, data residency or compliance constraints, any existing cloud accounts and the skills your team has to operate the result. Renvric will propose an approach, estimate running costs as ranges with assumptions, and agree acceptance criteria before build.

Start Your Project

Start your project

Fields marked * are required. An incomplete brief is fine: say what is still uncertain.

Preferred contact method *
Include the currency if you know it.
The outcome you need, the current situation, known constraints and timing.
NDA requirement
RFP or brief: PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint or text, up to 5 MB.